WK綜合論壇, WK综合论坛

 找回密碼
 立即注册
搜索
熱搜: 活动 交友 discuz
查看: 162|回復: 2
打印 上一主題 下一主題

[日韓] 雪白纯净的美女老师,让体育生玩的全身都在舒爽 [30P]

[複製鏈接]
累計簽到:1 天
連續簽到:1 天
跳轉到指定樓層
楼主
發表於 2024-9-20 20:41:18 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
) |% C  |; r- k- o
3 n0 I5 X$ x2 H

( \8 M# R$ d8 B3 e4 i% `/ ?
  I2 L+ H* \5 e9 y3 v$ e! s
0 A% W1 W0 B# a+ T" H
; g) S! ?1 R& Y4 ^  O0 Z
' a- e9 w3 j' N4 o$ v3 Z. r6 E
* S6 ?  X6 h8 A& D! f. o6 V7 ~- Q
' b9 O$ D6 v/ b' P* v' e/ d- b  |9 O+ y0 S' T( z! @4 l

0 c8 D& o$ @  U9 V! O/ F
* l8 f6 C4 q0 o$ G& K
! V/ T! A5 \9 p; A
" R0 L* ], |: P2 }2 G6 w1 T  s5 F9 k5 i& N" I8 s6 y( R" W
& L* M  j# M5 a, U
' J, R" m; q, B/ |

. J5 e+ R4 C$ z: p# o) h- `& ~3 R- v$ d2 ]. C2 y# {& T7 ~

) ^- p! F( x4 E5 i  M  t8 u
6 A! J% Q+ U! X  G% s
/ c  K9 h+ C" o' G  y( B8 D
. h/ P( [/ l. X% T% w' s# Z# d2 g) Y6 F% D
4 U& q: F- l" J6 R7 }
1 q& b( U: G( J9 k

: s7 b4 _3 j5 W: q! a
! O+ R4 J6 a( }* p7 L, ?' ^
% i* H7 x/ V$ v5 d/ h- p  F
- w2 B: ~* M1 P; Y+ K& ]4 _1 N  F' u! e8 ]( m/ o

% O' C* n% p. P9 g" E* s5 v( J: G6 v! C, C4 ]% l! T& B, w

2 n! l2 b* O( c5 F6 _/ s1 @, B9 O* y5 K, }) h. n

  T6 S' g' d% v2 c$ M* R* V5 l
2 S/ U$ M0 s: w( z# T7 G. B1 y8 x- [# }0 f; f% o% k' H

+ G, {/ L$ `, w. O- [! r4 D3 p: b$ K  L! G  W1 k
- c" h* ]+ k$ Z* F3 q% d
8 [+ `/ L6 |/ d# K' N# ?

0 h0 s7 w( n  y& t
; l# F. e9 ~2 q- J6 L; ?7 m  q  ^5 g2 H, z( Q0 ^, e% ~

3 x0 Z" [  M* Z' k+ E$ ~& H% H( @9 E+ l6 O6 t
$ z- c2 f5 E+ r5 _! z! y
: k' I# N$ ~! S7 A; B0 W
& }" ?2 x& G! x9 O6 E# z

+ p+ \) y! L  I: z
% X( ~, @9 O5 T# m9 |2 N8 x& C2 j9 b; d% T- k6 y

- K' q3 ]  e9 \0 i: K9 n4 s: w$ M! b. k2 Y6 @( E* g4 A. W

& B6 h$ L; s. a# d0 q8 N, R9 ^( @
2 M! @5 h$ |2 ?2 S
7 \6 v! Q+ H2 ?; h- F' h
/ f5 d( _5 h' N1 i: ^5 ?3 s% m
收藏收藏 贊贊(0)
把本文推薦給朋友或其他網站上,每次被點擊增加您在本站積分︰1宣傳
累計簽到:5 天
連續簽到:1 天
沙发
發表於 2025-1-4 02:48:33 | 只看該作者
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
Mohamed El Kholy , Rasha Tarif Hamza * , Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy0 e! Q9 M' Y/ {& e
Penile length and genital anomalies in Egyptian
- E) J+ W/ G+ F& ^( smale newborns: epidemiology and influence of; Q8 b- a, w! V  E; S, P2 l
endocrine disruptors9 r/ S3 q; f& E5 j( q5 ]. S; R
Abstract: This is an attempt to establish the normal0 V' _. ^2 M5 Z* W  Y* I; J5 B
stretched penile length and prevalence of male geni-
# B8 o: V3 D0 L; ^3 J6 ^tal anomalies in full-term neonates and whether they
+ _% e9 z4 g/ N3 o) @+ z1 F  Y% |are influenced by prenatal parental exposure to endo-
7 s6 D8 {5 r( y/ I8 r; s0 ycrine-disrupting chemicals. A thousand newborns were
- ~5 N( A% {2 I0 j8 I8 X; dincluded; their mothers were subjected to the following! e% D8 V% M9 a# j& ]
questionnaire: parents ’ age, residence, occupation, con-
1 |. Z2 G% k8 S% U; atact with insecticides and pesticides, antenatal exposure6 X6 a* X5 x6 m6 A
to cigarette smoke or drugs, family history of genital
  l: |0 v) P$ w  A1 {anomalies, phytoestrogens intake and history of in vitro2 Z: M/ Z3 v) ^: _) p
fertilization or infertility. Free testosterone was measured
* i! }& _; Y* k3 tin 150 neonates in the first day of life. Mean penile length2 i* ]2 |+ L7 _& e* `+ e  j
was 3.4 ± 0.37 cm. A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered( V# ?' N4 x* [3 M. C4 r
micropenis. Prevalence of genital anomalies was 1.8 %
0 g( g7 E, N7 z3 a+ E& ^# ](hypospadias 83.33 % ). There was a higher rate of anoma-8 _; c/ L1 n% x- z6 b) ^
lies in those exposed to endocrine disruptors (EDs; 7.4 % )
9 T6 y. x3 ~0 v3 ~# ^than in the non-exposed (1.2 % ; p < 0.0001; odds ratio 6,# y1 Q8 }7 A0 }
95 % confidence interval 2 – 16). Mean penile length showed; D" m# y  P# r4 t/ a! V- m
a linear relationship with free testosterone and was lower
% X6 B( b4 d% q( Win neonates exposed to EDs.
$ r' y( {  N5 x* o2 d/ ?Keywords: endocrine disruptors; genital anomalies; male;+ [5 \" d2 i9 ]. d2 Z) Q* \1 A
penile length; testosterone.
' p& k  D" |, F" r. C- B9 u*Corresponding author : Rasha Tarif Hamza, MD, Faculty of" b  c& x/ {# N* U' h& i8 D% ]4 ]
Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, 36
9 E: C: T' R; _# AHisham Labib Street, off Makram Ebeid Street, Nasr City, Cairo
6 x$ K4 c, D8 x# y+ B; u11371, Cairo, Egypt, Phone: + 20-2-22734727, Fax: + 20-2-26904430 ,
) Z0 |& Z8 B: q% h, `* ~! K3 dE-mail: rashatarif_2000@hotmail.com
2 ~, a8 N7 i* h- I' F) TMohamed El Kholy, Mohamed Saleh and Heba Elsedfy: Faculty of, M) f1 |2 j7 q; E$ i( M
Medicine , Department of Pediatrics, Ain Shams University, Cairo,
  a/ o2 R7 w- x! K! aEgypt/ T/ k; q( s3 s# b( N$ A
Introduction, M8 a; X/ Q. ^6 e& \
Determination of penile size is employed clinically in4 Z( k& f# j9 N4 y# @& \9 ]& T  A
the evaluation of children with abnormal genital devel-
9 d% E7 l8 Z" O" M. m- Mopment, such as, for example, micropenis, defined as a
1 F/ a) R0 b! R2 Q1 Ypenis that is normal in terms of shape and function, but is4 k! I- O+ F' a& i! |
more than 2.5 standard deviations (SD) smaller than mean
( x  d7 @- N. m) z; B; e/ lsize in terms of length (1) . However, these measurements
) s* _, ^6 t0 qcan be subject to significant international variations, in' w8 W0 f! x# I/ Q* V! }  v1 v; G& o
addition to being obtained with different methodologies: t- ?# e, F: ~4 {$ \# ~
in some cases (2) .
& [$ X7 X8 l  G' G( POver the past 20 years, the documented increase in
4 E/ ^1 d! K$ P' c  [* cdisorders of male sexual differentiation, such as hypo-
' m0 o+ ?0 N- F) P( w% M( v- R( p) qspadias, cryptorchidism, and micropenis, has led to the
7 c$ j8 ], O" C, D' \/ W7 ^: ssuspicion that environmental chemicals are detrimental! d; S$ K) h7 d, T
to normal male genital development in utero (3) . The so-
' e* P4 R1 f( d2 g9 k' a% |called Sharpe-Skakkebaek hypothesis offered a possible
5 ^2 Y) _, ~' L5 q9 V, X* ecommon cause and toxicological mechanism for abnor-
: a$ L+ P( Z/ G. K: W2 L# nmalities in men and boys – that is, increased exposure to' m7 S! n. Y; l  @' ^( p6 e) U. G
oestrogen in utero may interfere with the multiplication0 w& U* [5 T& _
of fetal Sertoli cells, resulting in hormonally mediated# o* M8 F6 S. A9 o' Y3 I% k, D/ d* R
developmental effects and, after puberty, reduced quality7 w$ @& n" \9 {5 `# u% S, J
of semen (4) .& q& U- g& P# o, j5 G
It has been proposed that these disorders are part of# X% ?! K( K; y
a single common underlying entity known as the testicu-6 t# `* F, Y- {# F( x) j
lar dysgenesis syndrome (TDS) (5) . TDS comprises various3 p& g" `# q" h" `* p
aspects of impaired gonadal development and function,. {5 b% w! c$ I$ \1 h
including abnormal spermatogenesis, cryptorchidism,) r7 Y; f! N- S
hypospadias, and testicular cancer (6) .
7 g5 f" _5 x! E1 X. \2 P$ \+ CThe etiological basis for this condition is complex
% K/ i0 B. o" O; F( Sand is thought to be due to a combination of both genetic8 l1 J8 S% {, V: J
and environmental factors that result in the disruption0 I8 `& [  s& i4 o
of normal gonadal development during fetal life. First,
9 @) U0 `* q* Z3 o' |. P2 Zit was proposed that environmental chemicals with oes-9 f8 r$ H: c* h* W- R
trogen-like actions could have adverse effects on male
/ u. s! q5 x2 @. Dgonadal development. This has since been expanded to7 P$ C* I4 R) @' \2 S) o: e
include environmental chemicals with anti-androgen
3 x- L) W5 P- T' o4 W" Uactions and it is now thought that an imbalance between
/ f: k8 c; v: J4 {! Candrogen and oestrogen activity is the key mechanism by
5 ~8 {& q1 ~7 Z/ twhich exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs)
" Y: ^$ H. G/ Y! q( B$ ?- wresults in the development of TDS and male reproductive
: @# R2 j% V. {tract abnormalities (5) .7 ?0 \" ~7 m4 T3 |8 R  F
With the increasing use of environmental chemicals,# j5 l* F" ~  a. Q* D7 a
an attempt was made to establish the normal stretched6 z9 X1 m0 V4 d1 ^3 r( E1 ]( L
penile length as well as the prevalence of male genital
8 X+ q. y# A& @8 u( ^2 R0 b4 qanomalies in full-term neonates and whether there is an
  _/ R: w1 h' O9 f/ Z# Ainfluence of prenatal parental exposure to potential EDCs
$ a# I1 a  G5 }& Q1 Y* n4 U" aon these parameters.
5 S- c. W& E" ?: O, l/ dBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco1 n" k" f3 Y7 E$ m7 v
Authenticated
* t2 E' }/ t1 q- tDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM& u) ?  U2 x" l7 X
510 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies
5 y* [5 Z4 H" @$ ]) E+ tSubjects and methods0 s, T2 b2 m+ \. D( H" b2 W- h
Study population
2 O- [0 |: e! R; FThe study was conducted as a prospective cohort study at the Univer-
) n" z  d3 k$ m" e) z/ K- }3 x* R5 ]sity Hospital of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt. A sample of 1000
$ D: H5 A" [7 }8 ~male full-term newborns was studied.% ]7 t5 u& `# j# E: `
Sampling technique
8 Q7 |  ]+ i* w6 U$ u  vThree days per week were selected randomly out of 7 days. In each: r2 M, ^- d9 L9 B! |* K( A/ [
day, all male full-term deliveries were selected during the time of fi eld& ^& S. q$ c8 C3 R
study (12 h) during the period from March 2007 to November 2007.
6 p0 K' r4 p  XStatistical analysis" B. S0 B& J1 T; }6 B
The computer program SPSS for Windows release 11.0 (SPSS Inc.,5 g! B! T, y- c4 I* d7 s7 @
Chicago, IL, USA) was used for data entry and analysis. All numeric, M4 C3 `1 y2 s0 E# n8 t
variables were expressed as mean ± SD. Comparison of diff erent vari-8 p3 H, R+ \# K* O+ x$ X
ables between two groups was done using the Student ’ s t-test for( L3 k# U  A- ]0 a5 Y: S! s
normally distributed variables. Comparisons of multiple groups were! y4 g$ o8 U& ~; z6 ]
done using analysis of variance and post hoc tests for normally dis-, o7 A7 Q# Z. u: }, @! A
tributed variables. The χ 2 -test was used to compare the frequency of
; U7 I7 X9 W8 u& m, H: j. W& d# L% Nqualitative variables among the diff erent groups; the Fisher exact test
# S) a! v+ h6 u7 l' `3 A8 ^was performed in tables containing values < 5. The Pearson correla-
3 A) g( Q% Y# _, `) [tion test was used for correlating various variables. For all tests, a* t+ ?3 E2 i- F) y) G, B8 j/ C
probability (p) < 0.05 was considered signifi cant (10) ., i0 h" C- f" A5 x
Results& R/ [: q+ M4 n% e
Data collected
/ ^, N( N7 b9 |0 |1 i! `1 s- lA researcher completed a structured questionnaire during inter-: \! Q5 y  Q% `% T) m3 W
views with the mothers. The questionnaire gathered information; c9 u1 ]8 d" x3 ?  F( c$ {
on the following: age of parents; residence; occupation of the
) J& q. I+ t0 |' r' qparents; contact with insecticides and pesticides and their type and
  I# S+ D4 U  |$ c( L! C( Q9 ^' {frequency of contact; maternal exposure to cigarette smoke during. o) o; y- R2 A+ T. p$ _
pregnancy; maternal drug history during gestation; family history* p0 x3 Q& Q+ s3 n( r- ?- y0 c9 n0 p
of hypospadias, cryptorchidism, or other congenital anomalies; in-
7 O* a0 K! g% m5 C# `take of foods containing phytoestrogens, e.g., soy beans, olive oil,
% p% e* k  A$ M( w7 V- O- s% ^2 [garlic, hummus, sesame seed, and their frequency; and, also, his-5 ?  I: c  X5 ?7 }8 y2 A0 L. ]
tory of in vitro fertilization or infertility (type of infertility and drugs6 y6 H+ B0 j: x$ X4 {- ?  s
given).
1 |* A8 e" R9 k4 Q  XEnvironmental exposure to chemicals was evaluated for its po-
& z/ j6 x+ ?- ttential of causing endocrine disruption. Chemicals were classifi ed
: n' B/ Y! y: Q, P9 O( {into two groups on the basis of scientifi c evidence for their having2 c: t% g2 f# D0 F6 P# i
endocrine-disrupting properties: group I: evidence of endocrine dis-
0 U7 Z; E2 Q3 wruption high and medium exposure concern; group II: no evidence of' Z5 }( B5 l$ g6 K3 t8 F! M3 Y
endocrine disruption and low exposure concern (7) .
. V' C0 X/ L# G7 P+ G& P! F' `Descriptive data
. }# r: {! i" r! h2 S" }The mean age of newborns ’ fathers was 36 ± 6 years (range: @& k+ ~5 x8 o, h- A
20 – 50 years) and that of mothers was 26 ± 5 years (range8 d6 k" E' ^) u' ]! J
19 – 42 years). Exposure to EDs started long before preg-
# }- y1 G/ G8 s. H( tnancy and continued throughout pregnancy. Regard-0 D+ M/ W  g' e9 O
ing therapeutic history during pregnancy, 99 mothers" F1 v) ~: ?  d1 C+ p; Z5 ~" |2 g( e
(9.9 % ) received progestins, 14 (1.4 % ) received insulin,2 ?3 E. D- R& T/ p8 q' _  y* x$ g
6 (0.6 % ) received heparin, 4 (0.04 % ) received long-) l) ]' b% p7 p& T' l7 U" a/ _
acting penicillin, 3 (0.3 % ) received aspirin, 2 (0.2 % ). a" J/ q1 z. ~# S- s; n1 h7 s) E& X
received B2 agonist, and 1 (0.1 % ) received thyroxin,
( t* ?0 w! x& \0 K* ywhile the rest did not receive any medications during
1 ~  s$ c9 m9 u( g) ~4 bpregnancy except for the known multivitamins and+ |% u+ b* A2 ~
calcium supplementations. In addition, family history  {! |/ s8 a' ^6 v
of newborns born small for gestational age was positive6 I1 e$ k/ U* ~0 j5 y( P  L' S) `) w
in 21 cases (2.1 % ).8 U1 p: f( z. ^! C
Examination
% b6 s* B# _; I7 t% ]* [7 E5 W4 K! MIn addition to the full examination by the paediatric staff , each boy
; P0 R6 b  q; x) W0 @% ]/ Pwas examined for anomalies of the external genitalia during the8 u0 f9 r3 h# W; r* R+ J
fi rst 24 h of life by one specially trained researcher. Examination
$ w! U) S! t; `1 f0 cof the genital system included measurement of stretched penile
7 d3 S6 P+ }% {2 [. ~length (8) and examination of external genitalia for congenital. Y+ R7 l0 f4 x5 g2 X& {
anomalies such as cryptorchidism (9) and hypospadias. Hypospa-
, v. H6 T) S. N0 O2 H1 ]dias was graded as not glanular, coronal, penile, penoscrotal, scro-( k# U% i! P2 M0 q
tal, or perineal according to the anatomical position. Cases of iso-( g/ V0 E/ h4 \- `) ^. X! r* t$ b
lated malformed foreskin without hypospadias were not included% G& D! Z. \3 P' q) l
as cases.9 K4 @% p9 D( `7 m- w+ A/ k" G) t1 Z
Penile length8 s4 N# c6 P# e8 C6 V
Laboratory investigations9 H" J8 W4 N! F; `: y3 v
Free testosterone level was measured in 150 randomly chosen neo-
7 z$ Q' d/ G+ \: f# ]* [( Snates from the studied sample in the fi rst day of life (enzyme im-! G4 s# N  G; i$ d" l" S! d: l
munoassay test supplied by Diagnostics Biochem Canada, Inc.,6 K. w: ^) O" R* x; `" Q$ s7 x
Dorchester, Ontario, Canada).+ W3 h" v5 a& l% f4 F' ^% A
Mean penile length was 3.41 ± 0.37 cm (range 2.4 – 4.6 cm).0 E& V/ i3 b" O. v
A penile length < 2.5 cm was considered micropenis ( < the3 S& T3 M: l* R1 v, S, F+ J* {9 ?
mean by 2.5 SD). Two cases (0.2 % ) were considered to- q  C  r; [' z' ~& ]8 \5 O5 e& D* F
have micropenis. Mean penile length was lower (p = 0.041)9 J) Y) v0 a6 F- {/ G  W7 [0 P
in neonates exposed to EDs (n = 81, 3.1 cm) compared to the
+ P. M9 ?$ `! |; }7 H, Rnon-exposed group (n = 919, 3.4 cm; Figure 1 ).
4 K6 M$ @& Q% v) q9 F1 [There was a linear relationship between penile length5 [$ L1 y- G& u
and the length of the newborn with a regression coef-; `3 \" o) f, A' M
ficient of 0.05 (95 % CI 0.04 – 0.06; p < 0.0001), i.e., there6 ?3 M7 j6 d3 c5 p' N' y
was an increase of 0.05 cm for each unit increase in length
* O2 |: i: G6 K5 w  p. ~(cm). Similarly, there was a linear relationship between
- r2 k# i6 V9 N' q8 upenile length and the weight of the newborn with a regres-
4 R, T& k4 H! {; {' [sion coefficient of 0.14 (95 % CI 0.09 – 0.18; p < 0.0001), i.e.,+ w6 n* s  E0 l
there was an increase of 0.14 cm for each unit increase in- d" t8 h, ]- l0 h
weight (kg).
3 \% ], @6 `8 [. ?Brought to you by | University of California - San Francisco5 K; o# c) h, f* q9 g6 l6 L2 l- }
Authenticated$ j# Y8 D7 p/ D8 S; s
Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM2 Y& m: U# H. v" e! \! n
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 511
% L" B) F! X  f3 Z1 b; ^3.452 p; k# F( D( p
3.40: p# E. ]. N! ~, i8 _
3.35. `; v* x( w" C2 E5 Y- R7 ?' g
3.30
/ C# r& d/ ^3 J% ^2 a8 d! s7 b( {3.25
6 a6 ~! g' r9 O3.207 K4 ?  \5 _8 |3 P2 M! ^
3.15
2 H' a+ l, w# d+ A( L; |# D: F3.10) u8 z3 x& ~5 [* B* u( P
3.05
7 D+ \# S; ^; z  C) G3.002 E- B6 Q* i* f- ]# P
2.95+ z0 R, q  W& N) E2 W  M
2.90
2 U2 x! U1 ?8 X8 {Mean
* t: z5 n) i( R9 p  G7 w9 I: Wpenile# }$ ~0 z& x) x: ?8 p) b4 f
length7 b+ R: ?6 l: b2 `/ j/ B: y
an odds ratio of 6 (95 % CI 2 – 16), i.e., the exposed persons
* V: N' d+ l: {8 U& m: e5 z/ Ywere six times more likely to develop anomalies than$ D( r% _9 Y8 F+ ~% X% z8 h3 C2 j
those not exposed (Table 1 ).
+ J0 e8 E: _/ c# m* MGenital anomalies were detected in the offspring( n0 Z. |/ Y# [9 u" i
of those exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons (9.52 % ),' a3 m, s+ D4 v5 S) U. E: h/ Q
phthalate esters (8.70 % ), and heavy metals (6.25 % ). In1 B! t; o( t3 J# ~
contrast, none of the newborns exposed to phenols had
; w- I  d2 T' z7 E4 V$ j% pgenital anomalies (Table 2 ).
& ?( ?- p# S$ L* P% \" L$ b" mExposed
% g+ p: o/ @4 {# X8 G) kNon exposed
8 d6 [, ?! t1 ?' H2 [3 O9 d- e1 ~Penile lengths according to exposure to endocrine
) e# W) a9 ~' B( ~. F/ w5 JFigure 1 disruptors.( V0 z, W3 {0 L$ @: w
Serum free testosterone levels
$ _3 G( `; G& bExposure to cigarette smoke and progestins& ]6 ?4 l# A: ~- Q* \
during the first trimester
6 q7 ]  j% u. h; `/ UNone of the mothers in the study was an active smoker;
/ b! l! h4 e8 r: }+ x  X) l( Z350 were only exposed through passive smoking. There
+ K& |. q( j4 y! Kwas no difference between rates of anomalies among( J7 R! @* f. R+ g
those exposed to cigarette smoke when compared to those" W4 T. ^- @& g  g* q
not exposed (1.1 % vs. 2.2 % ). Similarly, there was no differ-% A( G4 O7 }. k1 L: q' V( i
ence between the rates of anomalies among those exposed, d+ ]$ b" N% {5 I
to progestins during the first trimester when compared to  ]" \" I% x& B2 O
the non-exposed ones (2 % vs. 1.8 % ).) ^. V; q. H- B- S0 G5 ]
In the first day of life, serum free testosterone levels
; r* \4 n4 P$ r" C$ iranged between 7.2 and 151 pg/mL (mean 61.9 ± 38.4 pg/mL;5 Q  s3 ^/ ]1 m7 G
median 60 pg/mL). There was a linear relationship# f0 L, O: `* ?- a9 B/ l
between penile length and testosterone level of the
+ j' W2 a, E) k" q$ f$ f8 \1 f5 }8 xnewborn with a regression coefficient of 0.002 (95 % CI- z2 ]5 Z# T1 J& d( \/ {, V" G$ `
0.0004 – 0.003; p = 0.01), i.e., there was an increase of 0.2 cm
$ i7 p- T2 R' W- K9 t/ w/ L' y" yin penile length per 100 pg/mL increase in testosterone$ z+ r3 E* C6 F
level. Moreover, serum testosterone level was significantly. d3 j( y6 [8 ]2 z' P2 v4 E
lower in newborns exposed to EDs (49.50 ± 22.3 pg/mL)1 _6 X  ^: t6 p. n0 E
than in the non-exposed group (72.20 ± 31.20 pg/mL;
+ ^; ^% B  g3 T5 T, ?6 i) @" ~p < 0.01)., W" k9 c( D- p2 X0 S
Table 1 Frequency of genital anomalies according to type of
$ R7 Q. v  R. H2 m5 x/ sexposure to endocrine disruptors.0 t1 r, _. t$ V6 a5 y! |
Exposure to endocrine
# m! R5 G( P  {6 ?% x3 kdisruptors; b+ q; x  q: `$ T# p
Prevalence of genital anomalies
7 L8 j! d5 {6 s& AAnomalies Total
  @% u( B5 M$ v# E4 @8 \Negative Positive( U& f; w: F0 {0 _0 ]* }
Negative exposure 908 11 919
3 }2 O/ h# w6 W* W  A; z98.8 % 1.2 % 100.0 %
7 N4 c" D5 E# ]8 ?" `" Z& ?* |Positive exposure 75 6 817 \) h3 W" _& }1 F
92.6 % 7.4 % 100.0 %
5 w6 q& k9 R0 n( Y2 I: J: C5 lTotal 983 17 1000
- s4 [3 n+ X. R! Z98.3 % 1.7 % 100.0 %
7 r% g2 }  K- R% R: o& K! Eχ 2 = 25.05, p < 0.0001.
7 K. M, [% u. ~8 v* N' gOver the study period, the birth prevalence of genital$ Y0 w* F/ N$ q" ~6 S3 Q- r/ ?
anomalies was 1.8 % , i.e., 18/1000 live birth. Hypospadias
. K  u: W1 Z& [accounted for 83.33 % of the cases. Fourteen had glanu-% T  A0 V' J( r! l
lar hypospadias and one had coronal hypospadias. One
  N# J+ c0 `2 y; _$ H$ T; phad penile torsion and another had penile chordee. Right-* I8 _2 C4 {4 n. ^7 a" l' B' F9 O
sided cryptorchidism was present in one newborn.& _2 f+ c4 G2 M  J9 h; k
Exposure to EDCs, u$ }' V. d( D# J( i8 u6 y" w$ n+ ?
Among the whole sample, 81 newborns (8.10 % ) were4 K" }: o# B/ G; t0 z# z2 G2 S$ c
exposed to EDs. The duration of exposure varied from$ E+ L/ q1 H3 C9 w: M) J' @
2 to 32 years with a frequency of exposure ranging from5 K- z2 e1 X5 e; V' L0 l
weekly to 2 – 3 months per year.
1 l6 B+ ]1 `# d! tThere was a significantly higher rate of anomalies- w8 N. L! k' H0 V! b7 z1 z
among those who were exposed to EDs when compared; N6 U) Q8 H3 a
to non-exposed newborns (7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ; p < 0.0001), with
. r5 f. _/ q& L! }- E# Z% U4 H' fTable 2 Type of endocrine disruptor and percentage of anomalies in
8 p2 B" w- Q3 `1 ^% U- r! _/ Othe group of neonates exposed to endocrine disruptors (n = 81).% S4 H) J/ i" E- z2 g
Anomalies Total
! m- F0 [8 N, [5 i; Z1 h, jNegative Positive
( @6 Z7 P: i' {. AChlorinated hydrocarbons (farmers) 19 2 21/ e! a" @6 z: U: d5 D4 h" I
90.48 % 9.52 % 100.0 %
1 |. e$ t  J. Q( `3 J! f! E( MHeavy metals (iron smiths, welders) 30 2 32" I+ i: z7 [9 i/ f2 d
93.75 % 6.25 % 100.0 %
+ b: N+ a4 E/ b2 bPhthalate esters (house painters) 21 2 23
) y1 d- Z- a/ ]/ O7 A/ B) ~91.30 % 8.70 % 100.0 %2 p7 e2 `8 m8 S9 L/ h
Phenols (car mechanics) 5 0 58 J% S( U# W& ~6 q9 _" {
100.0 % 0 % 100.0 %
& g% ?* S: y4 I* L2 oTotal 75 6 81
( g; T7 U$ C  d0 J5 l( K92.60 % 7.40 % 100.0 %
2 S6 h- \9 H( M7 y% ]& IBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco0 {- N& ^! `( Q. M( n
Authenticated
! n+ n3 I! R4 B( gDownload Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM8 E% n' Y- i5 c
512 El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies6 \3 L, h3 ~5 q7 N
Discussion$ B5 L' C/ z8 x- \  K! ?* D7 h
Previously reported penile lengths varied from 2.86 to 3.75 cm) T7 \4 H% G, v* ^3 O- w% H& I5 \! o
(11 – 16) and depended on ethnicity. In Saudi Arabia (13) ,
+ t1 X, m+ v" r! B( @! smean newborn penile length was 3.55 ± 0.57 cm, slightly
! u# }$ m" x" |  I5 thigher than our mean value. However, the cut-off lower9 `1 A$ x3 ~" Z% Y
limit ( – 2.5 SD) was calculated to be 2.13 cm (vs. 2.5 cm in
& h: p/ e" K  D: k  Pour cohort). This emphasizes the importance of establish-1 b3 `3 j( @/ C" A$ o
ing the normal values for each country because the normal
; u+ v) P2 X) Y  srange could vary markedly. In a multiethnic community,* N) w& G% k3 P& Y2 r
a mean length of – 2.5 SD was used for the definition of: |0 z7 l& z5 ]/ V! Z
micropenis and was 2.6, 2.5, and 2.3 cm for Caucasian,
2 j! l% d: N5 T; ?$ l  c+ |* ~, YEast-Indian, and Chinese babies, respectively (p < 0.05).% V+ q/ L( Z( b. a. T
This is close to the widely accepted recommendation that
3 g, v- f  A8 W  d+ B: o/ ta penile length of 2.4 – 2.5 cm be considered as the lowest6 [: S  B$ `, `. B$ H& T
limit for the definition of micropenis (8) . The recognition( d% I6 {3 @9 I5 G
of micropenis is important, because it might be the only+ r7 E, e, ?/ w9 w
obvious manifestation of pituitary or hypothalamic hor-
2 z0 Z2 j- n+ J: ]- Q' Xmonal deficiencies (17) .
) X+ p% y/ O2 x5 g6 `$ h* [The timing for measurement of testosterone in new-7 X2 R5 ^- v8 N% B& l/ |
borns is highly variable but, generally, during the first 2
* h) ^* H  `) Y  D2 _weeks of life (18) . In our study, serum testosterone level
: M9 i; W- Q# G3 y/ Twas measured in all newborns on day 1 in order to fix a1 G: g  A$ K1 w
time for sample withdrawal in all newborns and, also, to" ?2 x' ?0 n2 k# N- H
make sure that all samples were withdrawn before mothers
8 ]: {9 o8 E, M  E) _were discharged from the maternity hospital. We found a: C9 y: }0 D; P! j' T
linear relationship between penile length and testosterone
6 h6 A0 Z2 |1 i# ]- y& V5 Q" Ilevels of newborns. Mean penile length was lower in neo-2 [, z( P- E9 K
nates exposed to EDs compared to the non-exposed group,
- v7 ?+ b9 B, `/ ?which could be related to the lower testosterone levels in' w1 a0 k" a# E+ S  D4 k
the exposed group. The etiology of testicular dysgenesis
) H6 b9 ?3 R( p' b9 n, tsyndrome (TDS) is suspected to be related to genetic and/or% f4 G! w( \0 X/ D; B$ }( D" M
environmental factors, including EDs. Few human studies
) K6 x& v' o+ ^! U8 n7 }2 phave found associations/correlations between EDs, includ-
; e2 o0 u! Y& ]* {" Sing phthalates, and the different TDS components (18) .
/ T5 B) p) ?. p5 fSome reports have suggested an increase in hypo-. [; c: ?3 W1 S6 f1 D
spadias rates during the period 1960 – 1990 in European
/ e+ Q9 [9 @1 b& }and US registries (19 – 23) . There are large geographical9 A, I) |$ s8 Z  Q7 I
differences in reported hypospadias rates, ranging from+ P3 J5 ~( _0 P0 O* C( Y
2.0 to 39.7/10,000 live births (23 – 25) . Several explanations* ?$ [3 f3 t4 L
have been proposed for the increasing trends and geo-1 U' G% C2 o& W
graphical differences. As male sexual differentiation is
  w$ h1 I: N! {critically dependent on normal androgen concentrations,
. V& H7 d$ }) D) R6 F* u" wincreased exposure to environmental factors affecting
9 \* u0 z. Z) E) k- mandrogen homeostasis during fetal life (e.g., EDs with& e# @* x' Q0 D2 x& @+ x7 Y) R
estrogenic or anti-androgenic properties) may cause4 V* F: J9 D; I; _$ o! D
hypospadias (3, 4) .  a6 q* _7 \9 ]
In Western Australia, the average prevalence of hypo-! E6 [  {0 r& E
spadias in male infants was 67.7 per 10,000 male births., K7 w( o/ v' Z; v8 q% W7 b( @
When applying the EUROCAT definition (24), the average
# W/ h1 l. g( _. fprevalence of hypospadias during 1980 – 2000 was 21.8 per
! S/ B- f! G: H7 ]% G. h10,000 births and the average annual prevalence increased1 t% D2 T9 }0 m! `$ @8 ~* W
significantly over the study period by 2.2 % per year. The
) J4 Z1 k' h. H3 rprevalence of hypospadias in this study was much higher
/ Z; C0 l5 u+ _5 x* B4 Iat 150 per 10,000; by excluding glanular hypospadias, the3 E! ~: C8 y2 l- ~% \  |
prevalence fell sharply to 10 per 10,000 (26) .0 p3 o- m3 G& i  d# o6 |
We found a higher rate of anomalies among newborns
3 q2 D1 e' T: ]: Q# v0 u/ Yexposed to EDs when compared to non-exposed newborns( ]) a! `# t/ j* j" M  h" f( i" |
(7.4 % vs. 1.2 % ); this raises the issue that environmental$ f& |! s+ k' F+ `$ j/ p
pollution might play a role in causing these anomalies.- L! [# j; E1 m9 D" e
Within the last decade, several epidemiologic studies
4 V2 O+ t0 J5 k# U1 ahave suggested environmental factors as a possible cause9 [* q& R  {4 N! K% y, o# o
for the observed increased incidence of abnormalities in
1 a3 _; ^. y- D0 C# Amale reproductive health (27) . Parental environmental/4 C2 D9 t% w  C4 B
occupational exposure to EDs before/during pregnancy% `- M" i6 z. d# z. F
indicates that fetal contamination may be a risk factor for( J- B& [7 p- c8 o/ V& q6 L4 r
the development of male external genital malformation5 T5 N5 m7 m( b1 j5 N
(27 – 29) .% @6 K% i' L4 E: z
Received October 25, 2012; accepted January 27, 2013; previously
. n1 Q% m9 a: X- x2 k# Gpublished online March 18, 2013
+ I' q6 S( p5 bReferences
; A6 Y& S# B; \3 G7 ?1. Aaronson IA. Micropenis: medical and surgical implications. J  I6 g7 ?* M# P1 `  _$ x+ Q
Urol 1994;152:4 – 14.
1 \# Z: Y8 T3 U% i# P7 _7 e+ N2. Gabrich PN, Vasconcelos JS, Dami ã o R, Silva EA. Penile anthro-
4 v7 X+ l+ f8 G3 M/ {pometry in Brazilian children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J)
+ j; X' d/ W; x& J* S- p3 E2007;83:441 – 6.
( X# w! r6 w' D7 V: q# Y2 l- Q3. Sultan C, Balaguer P, Terouanne B, Georget V, Paris F, et al.
' j4 `7 w9 n  [+ @4 gEnvironmental xenoestrogens, antiandrogens and disorders of
# {/ @" J6 I0 T$ s1 imale sexual differentiation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2001;10:178:
# ]; f6 K- p, P0 g) b2 {1 e' r5 D" f99 – 105.- @! w' @8 G5 l, l2 s; }' E$ \7 x" y
4. Sharpe RM, Skakkeb æ k NE. Are oestrogens involved in falling
/ C( r0 _+ Q/ I/ w# |5 L( P: qsperm counts and disorders of the male reproductive tract ?; [1 ?+ d: G# y, q# M; k( I' [: g: G& @
Lancet 1993;341:1392 – 5.; J! y! |- t1 @0 v3 c
5. Acerini CL, Hughes IA. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: a new: @6 C, H2 X6 J, `7 z! `" H
and emerging public health problem ? Arch Dis Child 2006;91:& d+ l5 e& e* U
633 – 41.9 y8 m( k$ b8 h6 i" e& f8 `" `+ x; c; O
6. Joensen UN, J ø rgensen N, Rajpert-De Meyts E, Skakkebaek NE.6 X, r& {& b6 j; `: k
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and Leydig cell function. Basic
" a3 V% J: B" M; g$ l$ NClin Pharmacol Toxicol 2008;102:155 – 61." c+ _2 _8 N$ r( d2 X( R
7. IEH. Chemicals purported to be endocrine disruptors: a4 ]- ]" I: \/ |6 t; f! D
compilation of published lists. (Web Report W20), Leicester,
0 f" Q. z5 R+ b  }% ~, I' pUK: MRC Institute for Environmental Health, 2005. Accessed on% o" e& [1 l$ X$ I$ H- q
March 2005. Available at http://www.le.ac.uk/ieh/.
- E# j1 v% ?  p8. Cheng PK, Chanoine JP. Should the definition of micropenis vary8 u& r. p) v4 a3 U, ]% q
according to ethnicity ? Horm Res 2001;55:278 – 81.
( e# h- D6 E) D" A$ f6 i0 O5 sBrought to you by | University of California - San Francisco5 \- q. C! `  z9 J
Authenticated
8 P9 y, G; t/ Q) x% |! C, Y4 ]Download Date | 2/18/15 4:26 AM+ s4 M9 h2 l, Y; ^" B
El Kholy et al.: Penile length and male genital anomalies 513" a6 U# S2 o& @+ y9 B. i
21. K ä ll é n B, Bertollini R, Castilla E, Czeizel A, Knudsen LB, et al.! j. l/ Q1 u, f; U) ~: Z
A joint international study on the epidemiology of hypospadias.! V- F0 n  F) T  L" a( s
Acta Paediatr Scand 1986;324(Suppl):1 – 52.' U. {0 o4 t8 L0 l) v% @+ o
22. Paulozzi LJ, Erickson JD, Jackson RJ. Hypospadias trends in two
# g3 U, h( q0 N2 ~US surveillance systems. Pediatrics 1997;100:831 – 4.
9 q! f) K( _! y, [2 L, L9 D2 A5 dpenile length in newborn and infants. BJU Int 1999;84 : 1093 – 4.3 E; h( ]' ^- e! o- i/ q& L
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 2000;13 : 55 – 62.
; t, U. E/ \- ^/ C- n9 y! a% rVasudevan G, Manivarmane B, Bhat BV, Bhatia BD, Kumar S.
% S7 G3 a0 j7 g8 m$ a$ QGenital standards for south Indian male newborns. Indian J% j$ ?1 v3 r* ~$ e3 y5 d9 Y* h
9. Scorer CG. The incidence of incomplete descent of the testicle at
( x" f- t% f) L6 fbirth. Arch Dis Child 1956;31:198 – 202.1 z" v, k0 _7 \) Z
10. Daniel WW. Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health; e. {5 i# {/ f# Z+ P
sciences, 6th ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1995.2 u. n' |# K4 z3 u: y
11. Flatau E, Josefsberg Z, Reisner SH, Bialik O, Iaron Z. Letter:, q" A4 T# _0 d; m4 z
penile size in the newborn infants. J Pediatr 1975;87:663 – 4.' J3 r. n. ]! D# y  h
12. Ozbey H, Temiz A, Salman T. A simple method for measuring' N4 d: X; ]! i' R& R5 U+ F
13. Al-Herbish AS. Standard penile size for normal full term2 |5 B/ @' p0 @4 M  n4 H, s
newborns in the Saudi population. Saudi Med J 2002;23:314 – 6.- U% F3 r; Y# Z* K( o+ a
14. Lian WB, Lee WR, Ho LY. Penile length of newborns in Singapore.3 B; U  p9 I$ ?, J) P
15. Pediatr 1995;62:593 – 6.. y3 M* W7 k2 U/ J- T5 }& s3 v
16. Boas M, Boisen KA, Virtanen HE, Kaleva M, Suomi AM, et al.
$ F2 o  g4 M7 L: ^3 L0 h) h- XPostnatal penile length and growth rate correlate to serum/ S3 l+ p8 d1 ^7 \6 K
testosterone levels: a longitudinal study of 1962 normal boys.
* d1 s2 |% l8 O8 f5 i' S% sEur J Endocrinol 2006;154:125 – 9.2 k" b% ~: A% ], g6 j
17. Camurdan AD, Oz MO, Ilhan MN, Camurdan OM, Sahin F,
$ |7 _% b0 g3 {4 _- Uet al. Current stretched penile length: cross-sectional study# s' W0 J; X! e$ \8 Z2 N4 ], |
of 1040 healthy Turkish children aged 0 to 5 years. Urology
8 K5 v! Z) n4 u- c2007;70:572 – 5.
, N5 t2 b1 d* u3 _$ Q+ U' V18. Bay K, Asklund C, Skakkebaek NE, Andersson AM. Testicular
. I6 `7 a" {( ^- s: Ydysgenesis syndrome: possible role of endocrine disruptors.
( z7 P* W. T+ IBest Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006;20:77 – 90.
* e; O+ P+ q: m7 ^8 Z/ N19. Czeizel A. Increasing trends in congenital malformations of male) W( q5 }: D9 V" p4 I
external genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:462 – 3.
" Y5 v1 p: {. [% }9 ~! P+ B20. Matlai P, Beral V. Trends in congenital malformations of external1 w, C3 x: K1 x  ]/ C& M  m$ x, T
genitalia. Lancet 1985;i:108.8 f- R# |& n7 F
23. Paulozzi LJ. International trends in rates of hypospadias
& y  B/ f/ |, V8 tand cryptorchidism. Environ Health Perspect 1999;107:
! t3 \3 |  h' N2 H297 – 302.. B# v( [( g: Z8 T, {( H+ O
24. EUROCAT Working Group. EUROCAT report 7. 15 years of
3 x7 N4 O+ w/ P8 `surveillance of congenital anomalies in Europe 1980 – 1994.
/ }" q: `  A7 XBrussels, Belgium: Scientific Institute of Public Health-Louis0 R7 H1 Z. A6 C! `  i6 \5 l! q
Pasteur, 1997.
/ V( _$ @- o: ~# g7 o25. Toppari J, Kaleva M, Virtanen HE. Trends in the incidence: Q- t  w* X) E1 J0 J+ u" V2 t
of cryptorchidism and hypospadias, and methodological# b) I5 }( N2 b# D
limitations of registry-based data. Hum Reprod Update
% f) h, h: E* [3 p8 H9 t: t) ?+ E. H2001;7:282 – 6.' c2 A$ |& F( W* y: @; @$ e4 A" t
26. Nassar N, Bower C, Barker A. Increasing prevalence of
  s& m+ Q/ n9 v7 O* J. rhypospadias in Western Australia, 1980 – 2000. Arch Dis Child
3 j7 s3 X: ]+ |4 F6 A2007;92:580 – 4.* Q0 I) h  F8 }- N
27. Wang MH, Baskin LS. Endocrine disruptors, genital6 L1 T! E. r- [! A+ z# R  D3 J; |
development, and hypospadias. J Androl 2008;29:499 – 505.% H4 I  b+ T( a
28. Morales-Su á rez-Varela MM, Toft GV, Jensen MS, Ramlau-Hansen- _2 ^2 a" E5 [  a: L- ^( L
C, Linda Kaerlev L, et al. Parental occupational exposure to
, G; @! P! `4 w5 d* f3 zendocrine disrupting chemicals and male genital malfor-
. ?, Z3 f: S3 Vmations: a study in the Danish National Birth Cohort Study.
2 k$ I- T" r3 v7 b2 VEnviron Health 2011;10:3.4 L! u0 U% J( B6 M+ R
29. Gaspari L, Sampaio DR, Paris F, Audran F, Orsini M, et al. High/ a$ a8 B: k/ {( |
prevalence of micropenis in 2710 male newborns from an1 D2 W1 E% ^( S: A! _/ p& ?
intensive-use pesticide area of Northeastern Brazil. Int J Androl
" @. u- }2 t% m2 {6 D( x) r2012;35:253 – 64.
累計簽到:5 天
連續簽到:1 天
板凳
發表於 2025-1-4 03:05:44 | 只看該作者
VIP精品區,資源無限好賺金任務區,輕松賺金幣
加入VIP,享受高級特權宣傳賺金又升級,超級棒
RESPONSE OF MICROPENIS TO TOPICAL TESTOSTERONE AND
% M; @$ c. r* `, ?6 H' R) fGONADOTROPIN
6 Y' O! u4 n2 ORICHARD C. KLUGO* AND JOSEPH C. CERNY
+ F4 ?' D" @, N/ d* j! |& qFrom the Division of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
7 j; Q1 R  c- A9 P* E5 E# s2 qABSTRACT
; @) l- ~5 U; h5 Y+ L' SFive patients were treated with gonadotropin and topical testosterone for micropenis associated$ O+ Z/ W) [5 W: m/ ]5 w
with hypothalamic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. All patients received 1,000 units of gonado-; {. R, T' a( P& @8 O9 z
tropin weekly for 3 weeks, with a 6-week interval followed by 10 per cent topical testosterone
0 C. E+ z* D' V; H% C( ~cream twice daily for 3 weeks. Serum testosterone levels were measured and remained equivalent
* Y5 ?, b( S2 p8 Yfor both modes of therapy. Average penile growth response with gonadotropin was 14.3 per cent
& z. f( x6 ^3 W4 j: gincrease in length and 5.0 per cent increase of girth. Topical testosterone produced an average
* ?; G7 O. d: o9 f0 X7 Y; ]  ^6 Wincrease of 60 per cent in penile length and 52. 9 per cent in girth. The greatest growth response$ T5 e* ^7 h6 B
occurred in prepuberal male subjects with a minimal response in postpuberal male subjects. This7 f# q; T8 q, p' }& z; ^
study suggests that 10 per cent topical testosterone cream twice daily will produce effective penile
" P0 v. x5 U" x. u, A7 h6 zgrowth. The response appears to be greater in younger children, which is consistent with previ-
2 D0 ~8 X# B+ ?8 Y/ O8 p: Cously published studies of age-related 5 reductase activity.
: \9 f9 ~& n+ {" F0 z8 s3 w) @Children with microphallus regardless of its etiology will( ?, G" D, K# ~* r6 L
require augmentation or consideration for alteration of exter-3 X) h% \, Z' e* I
nal genitalia. In many instances urethroplasty for hypo-
" m4 c; ]" S" R" kspadias is easier with previous stimulation of phallic growth.
% L* {! L( U$ ~/ v! O% MThe use of testosterone administered parenterally or topically4 }2 a  _/ S. |( {, N/ g
has produced effective phallic growth. 1- 3 The mechanism of
, K; `3 ?4 Y3 m8 t" dresponse has been considered as local or systemic. With this- X7 P; x. [& q6 G- ^) ~. j' f4 W
in mind we studied 5 children with microphallus for response- X1 o$ R; Z$ Q7 y4 t
to gonadotropin and to topical testosterone independently.
% J+ E- P' v7 w4 oMATERIALS AND METHODS/ x- G3 K2 N/ T) \
Five 46 XY male subjects between 3 and 17 years old were& f9 j$ O1 B2 J% c$ B
evaluated for serum testosterone levels and hypothalamic- w0 Y# ~. P5 j' H9 |0 _/ O* U6 ~. d4 j2 `
function. Of these 5 boys 2 were considered to have Kallmann's$ W! P  [: T$ \. j8 i9 I, \9 j
syndrome, 1 Prader-Willi syndrome and 2 idiopathic hypotha-! p' `" f! `; t4 _+ O9 y  Y
lamic deficiency. After evaluation of response to luteinizing+ T. U9 p1 Z$ y) A4 g* ~
hormone-releasing hormone these patients were treated with  k6 S& T2 d% j& Z, W: k
1,000 units of gonadotropin weekly for 3 weeks. Six weeks; Y1 o0 B/ H# |
after completion of gonadotropin therapy 10 per cent topical. O  _. E3 H& t% u
testosterone was applied to the phallus twice daily for 3 weeks.
! O, c2 ^8 a" h# B8 o) b  KSerum testosterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulat-
# {6 R# G% a+ hing hormone were monitored before, during and after comple-, V. K+ h' M; U, [" O2 j! K. p8 V/ i
tion of each phase of therapy. Penile stretch length was1 h+ \$ p" f% C4 Z& O9 q
obtained by measuring from the symphysis pubis to the tip of
$ j8 t7 P. x2 R1 T' S: h$ q* kthe glans. Penile circumferential (girth) measurements were
, O" \0 ]* i" lobtained using an orthopedic digital measuring device (see/ ~) [5 ~: u8 e0 @# _
figure).  Q/ ]" o6 l: {! W* s3 ?7 }
RESULTS
9 f; ?9 M+ ?* P& t8 r- YSerum testosterone increased moderately to levels between! S4 F% q. t' Y* ^+ \
50 and 86 ng./dl. with gonadotropin stimulation. Serum testos-
2 K" W& a, {& n2 y. u8 rterone levels with topical testosterone remained near pre-# Z8 ~& r# d; R- @" O
treatment levels (35 ng./dl.) or were elevated to similar levels6 E) E4 l( a/ t3 B. y
developed after gonadotropin therapy (96 ng./dl.). Higher* E6 \. o% M& Q8 ^# t
serum levels were noted in older patients (12 and 17 years old),' y  k* I5 J5 d+ M- C0 K5 s
while lower levels persisted in younger patients (4, 8, and 10
( a% x& `; x( Byears old) (see table). Despite absence of profound alterations
( c9 s" V1 |/ s7 w% I! q% Tof serum testosterone the topical therapy provided a greater* H2 l( n6 S+ n
Accepted for publication July 1, 1977. ·
) b. W: u# @+ ]( q6 m% R) L/ |# IRead at annual meeting of American Urological Association,
, N2 `7 U2 P- l( J0 dChicago, Illinois, April 24-28, 1977.
+ w* {* ~. T4 _8 g1 ?  B* Requests for reprints: Division of Urology, Henry Ford Hospital,+ J5 C$ _9 M$ \' W/ o0 X
2799 W. Grand Blvd., Detroit, Michigan 48202.
: @& |, ]. ~4 f5 H5 `5 mimprovement in phallic growth compared to gonadotropin.
  ?# K- G" T: @6 K- p8 GAverage phallic growth with gonadotropin was 14.3 per cent
6 _" _; u) a4 C: c5 V; Y. @increase in length and 5.0 per cent increase of girth. Topical
" C1 R7 F: C# q7 ktestosterone produced a 60.0 per cent increase of phallic length' u/ ]* q8 u+ [2 L& N4 ?& }
and 52.9 per cent increase of girth (circumference). The
& Z9 L' x. V* d0 K% j$ Qresponse to topical testosterone was greatest in children be-
1 e. F# ~6 b; F6 y, v  ^tween 4 and 8 years old, with a gradual decrease to age 171 F; s: U$ ^, r) ^# z) s2 q* ]
years (see table).4 l: i0 p( ?; o1 y& G* a, X
DISCUSSION
& X+ Z3 n9 X2 T/ H: W5 xTopical testosterone has been used effectively by other
# T9 @* N' X7 ^% r: z3 ]' W" O5 O3 lclinicians but its mode of action remains controversial. Im-" Y  D$ t6 I. Y$ R: D
mergut and associates reported an excellent growth response
* W8 b+ D: D  `1 t4 cto topical testosterone with low levels of serum testosterone,
4 e9 m/ \8 n" S7 ]! jsuggesting a local effect.1 Others have obtained growth re-) i  `) o+ ~; c; Z1 Y
sponse with high. levels of serum testosterone after topical
) B: p7 A# c& d7 Y; |$ E" T/ O' Yadministration, suggesting a systemic response. 3 The use of6 J- @3 T) D; j' Z
gonadotropin to obtain levels of serum testosterone compara-
! `/ I; W0 N( Uble to levels obtained with topical testosterone would seem to! R/ f4 e1 S. \3 F# \2 ^$ \" _
provide a means to compare the relative effectiveness of
! A6 q  m5 D5 K; m8 v' Y4 V* c$ atopical testosterone to systemic testosterone effect. It cer-0 q  w, ?% Q6 x$ H9 B  J
tainly has been established that gonadotropin as well as par-0 U5 \7 x% e/ ?# N( T0 @
enteral testosterone administration will produce genital( O% o2 v5 O5 h! d+ Z/ Y
growth. Our report shows that the growth of the phallus was
, n$ c5 k( s( @1 E" tsignificantly greater with topical applications than with go-
" }# x- |# F, J0 jnadotropin, particularly in children less than 10 years old.( P8 S' _+ [& v/ r  S
The levels of serum testosterone remained similar or lower. i" A1 B( P0 ]7 g, ^) e% Y# c7 u
than with gonadotropin during therapy, suggesting that topi-
# V  z- i( J( o8 q9 D) Dcal application produces genital growth by its local effect as
) E  J: e! e6 ]1 D8 Uwell as its systemic effect.
1 }. W$ I+ Z" K  ]Review of our patients and their growth response related to( V3 x) e" A1 D; M7 n
age shows a greater growth response at an earlier age. This is
2 g9 n6 |% Z0 m# S- T. j7 Z! Qconsistent with the findings of Wilson and Walker, who4 }$ ?2 `$ G3 C  ~( Y5 M+ _
reported an increased conversion of testosterone to dihydrotes-9 e3 A5 L. n* ?: u* J
tosterone in the foreskin of neonates and infants.4 This activ-9 m; }' S% C6 j& L6 B9 T( f
ity gradually decreases with age until puberty when it ap-
6 E! C. B% a* ^. Fproaches the same level of activity as peripheral skin. It may; C& x) Y+ a. p. K) q0 @
well be that absorption of testosterone is less when applied at
8 l  S9 J- ?" F4 I' dan earlier age as suggested by lower serum levels in children
' o" L, z- [5 m  z6 U: pless than 10 years old. This fact may be explained by the
) D. [0 ]: _8 T8 N0 y% }+ L) egreater ability of phallic skin to convert testosterone to dihy-* J4 B/ d. |# s
drotestosterone at this age. Conversely, serum levels in older
. G/ S7 n3 t/ |1 cpatients were higher, possibly because of decreased local
3 S7 c! c9 M9 K  k667
9 t; g- x2 M% l668 KLUGO AND CERNY
- d5 `7 R. `* ~% f  vPt. Age
1 A2 I5 R+ m% p% Y(yrs.)4 u. z( Z% m. B8 n
Serum Testosterone Phallus (cm.) Change Length
6 u: C$ O, v* R: W. D(ng./dl.) Girth x Length (%)
2 D( w5 h# F8 E; b4& r1 l+ a, |. S# S, _- Y- x
8
- ]1 h% Z; e" A6 H, b" T5 E2 E10
  X+ C- i8 j; @- C' a6 E* k128 g: r/ v$ ^1 q4 y
17  }. _; }+ r/ P  w  s. C# U; A
Gonadotropin7 P% a  n# D4 C( l2 P
71.6 2.0 X 3 16.6$ v7 C: H6 p: n3 D9 h' ]1 r
50.4 4.0 X 5.0 20.0
9 j& }# g1 g) v7 o5 Q* a6 N22.0 4.5 X 4.0 25.0
0 U, E! o; ]) }$ o84.6 4.0 X 4.5 11.1& G7 D; S/ s, ~. C$ k# b5 G
85.9 4.5 X 5.5 9.0
* \* }1 j( X7 n3 c* |- E. MAv. 14.3
* y% E  M- \8 z6 Z4 f( c; m4: O( O* F. S$ `# }% {
8
; t9 k+ v* k7 k10" g* W2 h: o0 R- P
12; u* r. C! ]( }! e- Z; r
17. Y( X* l# F$ y9 z
Topical testosterone
( v- @$ @# M) K# `7 [34.6 4.5 X 6.5 85% @0 G. ^# x4 u2 D/ @" j. Q, I& R# ]
38.8 6.0 X 8.5 70; i! x$ T' y6 z5 {! {5 n+ X
40.0 6.0 X 6.5 62.5) l4 w/ P- }9 P' C* m, b* O
93.6 6.0 X 7.0 55.5
# `% ]! i& h9 l3 G1 d95.0 6.5 X 7.0 27.2
& g) a4 [( c% HAv. 60.0
$ B+ R2 W' t6 U- u* m* mavailable testosterone. Again, emphasis should be placed on; o9 U& R, A# b1 f& R# r3 w7 i) c
early therapy when lower levels of testosterone appear to7 r6 g- m8 q9 I0 N6 e5 d4 ]  o" C
provide the best responses. The earlier therapy is instituted
2 B9 h/ a5 C2 ~# c. a0 ^# Bthe more likely there will be an excellent response with low
& ?! y8 s' L, X1 R0 mserum levels. Response occurs throughout adolescence as
: z" ^% O- h* g! Hnoted in nomograms of phallic growth. 7 The actual response
$ s( X- T- U5 oto a given serum level of testosterone is much greater at birth% m% f. V. l" ~: ?% L
and gradually decreases as boys reach puberty. This is most
3 p6 A5 o7 {) q/ \4 ^likely related to the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotes-/ d2 f2 I& `7 ?( r8 z- }' E
tosterone and correlates well with the studies of testosterone1 y. }# t  `6 Z, L
conversion in foreskin at various ages.8 w- _2 O/ a  N3 [2 d
The question arises regarding early treatment as to whether; O2 l8 l/ K7 V+ D0 f
one might sacrifice ultimate potential growth as with acceler-! i; u, X8 z/ s& `: _4 {
ated bone growth. The situation appears quite the reverse
: v( q# t- l& Iwith phallic response. If the early growth period is not used! B: I6 f* B3 r% a& |8 V0 X
when 5a reductase activity is greatest then potential growth
: m8 X$ S9 W$ X9 e# F  K: Z! Dmay be lost. We have not observed any regression of growth; w. \: s3 ?& |0 X
attained with topical or gonadotropin therapy. It may well
" k7 A8 \# w( ube that some patients will show little or no response to any- s5 _7 z( ?% O* _
form of therapy. This would suggest a defect in the ability to
3 ^6 f. L5 n' r4 B$ {convert testosterone to dihydrotestosterone and indicate that
) G( }+ l  \4 y- G1 Wphallic and peripheral skin, and subcutaneous tissue should
; f/ O9 G) v: @( f+ d# n' P. pbe compared for 5a reductase activity.0 |! Q+ t" M  I. r# _
A, loop enlarges to measure penile girth in millimeters. B,+ c) @$ `) [; _
example of penile girth computed easily and accurately.
& ?: j- S* l# Z7 Gconversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone. It is in this
* ~. ]; y* x3 u0 S6 e' Qolder group that others have noted high levels of serum
- P* W+ j! N$ q  B& R1 M5 j" btestosterone with topical application. It would also appear* _" j6 w' x: A4 l; W
that phallic response during puberty is related directly to the( K; [& x3 ^, [: ]) f
serum testosterone level. There also is other evidence of local
/ S! ?# c: V& K& \' N8 Nresponse to testosterone with hair growth and with spermato-" y( r! o2 s; O  q( S$ B) d+ }$ a
genesis. 5• 6
) Y- Q5 i3 ^. P4 |2 Q  V% kAdministration of larger doses of gonadotropin or systemic
7 T$ p# v. @- y  t$ M8 wtestosterone, as well as topical applications that produce: k3 {# q  x& `2 j$ l
higher levels of serum testosterone (150 to 900 ng./dl.), will3 \& g( m1 ~' D) l) p8 q
also produce phallic growth but risks accelerated skeletal
9 x" e! L) \+ z4 imaturation even after stopping treatment. It would appear
# g! |' V- p0 uthat this may be avoided by topical applications of testosterone4 q/ y$ `, b/ F$ Y. q- u
and monitoring of serum testosterone. Even with this control4 t5 [" O* B" K7 Q
the duration of our therapy did not exceed 3 weeks at any) I) z+ _8 K! R, w2 c* D! m1 V
time. It is apparent that the prepuberal male subject may
1 F# k/ [# ^2 F9 B: K; I  hsuffer accelerated bone growth with testosterone levels near2 ?" z# k" t8 w9 Q3 r: Y( H
200 ng./dl. When skeletal maturation is complete the level of! f: E7 N: {$ Z
serum testosterone can be maintained in the 700 to 1,300 ng./
3 V0 d0 u! v/ i5 h, T! _dl. range to stimulate phallic growth and secondary sexual
  h% G7 N- W, a/ J+ dchanges. Therefore, after skeletal maturation parenteral tes-5 p+ v3 X' l) `# j) i
tosterone may be used to advantage. Before skeletal matura-! \2 w- O. e0 \5 z0 q
tion care must be taken to avoid maintaining levels of serum% f5 o2 I7 D8 d% f+ c8 E
testosterone more than 100 ng./dl. Low-dose gonadotropin3 o& {& l$ ]+ ?0 O) F9 ~# Z9 j6 r
depends upon intrinsic testicular activity and may require
! M; q5 x6 m, s3 Bprolonged administration for any response.0 Z. U0 H5 e% v2 c0 G* ]
Alternately, topical testosterone does not depend upon tes-2 k7 t+ d. Q& o, }9 X7 N
ticular function and may provide a more constant level of2 s$ |' ^6 D5 t" W
REFERENCES" q) |" ^  {  d: F9 _6 w
1. Immergut, M., Boldus, R., Yannone, E., Bunge, R. and Flocks,
1 z5 Q4 m; Z" }/ O* ]& T/ r8 `R.: The local application of testosterone cream to the prepub-
: j7 R. C: u" l  P1 hertal phallus. J. Urol., 105: 905, 1971.
4 E" p4 ~, Z. ?3 G2. Guthrie, R. D., Smith, D. W. and Graham, C. B.: Testosterone
( B/ o  [% M9 o3 Jtreatment for micropenis during early childhood. J. Pediat.,
# B0 d0 ?8 k; F, l' L8 y83: 247, 1973.* T/ H9 j6 y9 n, M7 t2 F# Z: |
3. Jacobs, S. C., Kaplan, G. W. and Gittes, R. F.: Topical testoster-6 K) n6 c. b: x& T
one therapy for penile growth. Urology, 6: 708, 1975.
% P. n+ d( j/ J5 ?/ |6 }4. Wilson, J. D. and Walker, J. D.: The conversion of testosterone
% r3 F: q' K: vto 5 alpha-androstan-17 beta-01-3-one (dihydrotestosterone) by' a9 L' G) \& |! a& [- K
skin slices of man. J. Clin. Invest., 48: 371, 1969.
* N: J, b7 W( @' L5 T3 R5. Papa, C. M. and Klingman, A. M.: Stimulation of hair growth+ Q4 P1 G( Q, ?- g
by topical application of androgens. J.A.M.A., 191: 521, 1965.
8 {6 x9 b& t/ X6 |, A- W' h6. Gittes, R. F., Smith, G., Conn, C. A. and Smith, F.: Local& P7 B( L% ~- i. y& I
androgenic effect of interstitial cell tumor of the testis. J.
# W$ ~: ^6 f! R& l: |- \Urol., 104: 774, 1970.0 _& n0 b# d& l
7. Schonfeld, W. A. and Beebe, G. W.: Normal growth and varia-
4 i# n: p5 p' t) |; Stion in the male genitalia from birth to maturity. J. Urol., 48:
 分享同時學會感恩,一句感謝的話語,就是最大的支持!  歡迎交流討論
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 立即注册

本版積分規則


快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表