- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
0 v" p# C* F$ G6 [Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
[' u3 P/ G/ e3 \: F5 SExposure to Testosterone
% v, i2 W; a4 {1 v1 a: ^$ lSamar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
% p# c3 e6 `2 X$ }% {# R; Qand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
7 U- z, N/ R& K5 A U: \" ?Clinical Pediatrics- M/ U2 G/ X" l8 G. K
Volume 46 Number 6
- I' D/ b7 Q, y1 \" t( TJuly 2007 540-5433 C& i, t/ t! k
© 2007 Sage Publications
( M: ~7 p; j2 K7 R: m# f10.1177/0009922806296651
z, J6 f$ z' K3 t+ i& D, q \http://clp.sagepub.com
+ u* J+ M; x. h. ghosted at
5 X$ Q$ S; k0 Qhttp://online.sagepub.com
+ r1 P* J! A X6 Z. F5 kPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
# ~' w+ S D$ ?8 U* Ais a significant concern for physicians. Central
* V; t" |/ V U# ]; h. h% |$ pprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
- i* D. ~2 X- `4 y0 D. l* o* ^& `through the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
9 _4 [' H/ i: x8 E4 b& }a higher incidence of organic central nervous system4 n# d" `$ x7 y# _' i/ B
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
D/ u2 }3 J6 q$ l' Y3 Gby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
5 \0 ]9 M1 u9 `# Yhair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
- d' s0 K* I. R6 ncles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We" M2 p# F3 M6 U9 u! o: w
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
2 ~! c4 ~4 b2 J" o8 M" p' }enlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
( |2 D9 e; m9 x) k5 {/ F. _ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
6 I" _1 w& h. ^- L0 uto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by# N* N4 e7 j+ S+ T
the father. The family initially concealed this infor-4 I, o8 L* f) v% A" E; R
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this9 O7 ?$ x" d8 d2 V6 T# g6 u. }
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
& P) ?' z: D# k6 y1 n7 K$ F+ otestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-& r$ `- v- K# h- g
bly more common than the rare case report in the
- i) U" _4 n6 [) S; s( \5 Vliterature.41 I0 E4 T& T0 I( ?/ g4 I
Patient Report3 {( ?, r* G: W& X0 m
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
: d: U& z; h0 ]0 }endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern4 L# _$ A* v' k( d! S
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
% O: V5 P5 q# R9 P6 Ulight colored pubic hair development when he was
! M- w* y' a( e& g6 pFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of( K8 X \3 j; [" I' a0 I: b( B) S
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama., `: x9 n& {# V8 H. C
Address correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,
+ Q$ d q- h& P' J$ H3 }' l3 c) fProfessor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of+ s X' U% s& ` B6 B
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;. W5 y4 N6 O( X# a6 \8 w9 E* [
e-mail: [email protected].' S4 t0 ^9 f6 f6 _& v
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
- C% z& Y; B1 Z5 @9 y7 y Y0 {darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
3 q7 K N& I2 F# R' J& |ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
* y! ~" m9 ?+ p! x' y# @1 s5 zwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
/ D5 x7 f$ x1 B3 _) J3 [( _a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of+ C7 P8 k: |5 C5 k' l& s$ q" _
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year
% o, o) t$ K& z3 Q& nof life and was still receiving breast milk along with
8 a- v9 e) k/ O3 n) O# s! w! wsolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,5 Z+ G0 J* f) }% d6 ]6 m& C; x& C
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
; i7 P, \: T5 f! ~" @was age appropriate.% |: V, J! r( K! F/ Z- Q5 A
The family history was remarkable for the father,
5 j1 R/ S+ Q5 W4 g0 j" dwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
$ h; P7 D& b1 ^& X$ g; W' C4 o% a9 ^which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s6 I( k! G) y+ t0 ]+ B4 ]6 W
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat: O7 ^ U% t# g
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
. }' {$ n/ W6 d, k. _' l8 MThe father denied taking any other medication. The
& T# r/ e7 H% \; u3 x, j' qchild’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
, P6 r9 m( c) ~* T* Iwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet4 r+ |+ D% q: Y
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-+ q) P" f* g+ u$ n5 R0 Q
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
$ C/ }7 n; t8 W/ ]3 n) ?tives. There were no siblings." b4 r( v5 U+ b, z0 R0 R
Physical Examination1 j8 n( _) J% m1 U6 @
The physical examination revealed a very active,
1 J. z% K0 J- ?playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
; w" M, u5 O/ h# pa blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was0 `9 d5 z+ A/ i6 M$ x: ^0 N+ h
90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg% k/ B: R; P. c9 G6 Z( y3 u# H
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
- R4 d4 K8 t; dvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of, Q" c% R6 ]( H/ I
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
: P$ R6 N- L! fThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for
! l9 Z- L, Q$ @% }% zenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of9 H& i$ {4 h+ ?# \$ F
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
3 J5 I+ ^9 t% l( q5 ]! jdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
5 W- Q# g, H+ L: k: z540% j4 P# p9 B; [" t; @/ A7 [
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from; y- w# [+ y. G+ ~3 }$ h- o
the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The# z* U. N8 w1 S# Y! J7 k
testicular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
# `+ D- e% A3 y1 LThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
3 o. W4 E5 n g) l* b7 ~, ?' \oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no: u, E0 B! ]% R( q0 P( {$ H
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.5 x+ R% K8 O8 ~* W' F7 Y
Neurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
2 @5 T: @2 D; c9 `. ~6 }2 Fbilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
- L0 k, [' |/ g* `of papilledema." c# f' N7 U$ a0 ?$ e% Q9 \
Laboratory Evaluation
0 ?5 @$ {: I( E7 ~- `. w3 ~The bone age was consistent with 28 months by5 N7 K4 |) K9 M- j' G& |
using the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-. T1 X' C& \: r, V6 z) g" a3 D
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal- v) Z! ]4 W" M/ @
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test$ T* s, v& V1 `5 U3 G" V
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
% ^% t' K9 _7 `: ^: i3 dlating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).8 S9 s6 A9 a* ]5 u# i$ a
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood4 ` {: j2 Y3 N; w
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were/ Z% y* c+ B" f9 M j! q
within normal range for his age. The concentration( r8 @! R, f2 d3 X
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
/ ~4 `0 k( x3 X8 z- R- c0 k8 n" c(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
8 G' f- D3 n; W- [ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
' G7 R- @- w' S2 E' Eterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
' r' @! W" ~1 q& Q- H. y: }desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to
; D/ ^2 {1 J. W5 A49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
0 _9 \6 z( K" j4 N6 g# ~was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
3 ?' f$ B2 c1 h Ptisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
/ {) Z2 _; k4 { ~" b: o }testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),7 ?+ E: A, _+ w/ P. w2 `3 P
and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than ~% |* Z, U1 I2 \2 W* N
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
; E1 Z$ E9 r% G, gstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
( b) H' V$ L9 t2 C5 }concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL1 t9 @. ~. @8 G8 f
(prepubertal).
- t8 G8 }2 m" T4 j9 ]The parents were notified about the laboratory- _3 l, F& g+ N" [
results and were informed that all of the tests were
- Q+ V! g8 r5 N8 f% G5 j) Z3 U/ U; Cnormal except the testosterone level was high. The
' Q. C2 W/ `7 {) `: u/ gfollow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to$ G" w% l. z6 Q0 ^" o. ~. |
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
2 _% o$ J; Z9 S( s ]ever, the family did not return for 4 months. ]0 m( ]/ ]5 _' J8 j4 U5 m7 g
Physical examination at this time revealed that the
) M6 c' q% K) }9 z) r" Z8 lchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
8 [1 ^5 c/ T2 k* [* q2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained9 ]) T! t k) [, B2 i0 a5 w5 C% Y2 E
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-4 o9 q+ j) Q( Z
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
/ a4 v9 k5 j. xthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 25 L$ D+ J. S$ f0 [# Y. [( {) u
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.' h; x5 K$ O/ j% w
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-7 g; V( x! N) V- n. `! a
ing frequent erections. X3 C2 n, _. ?
Both parents were again questioned about use of
" T' Q( }: o c" @1 yany ointment/creams that they may have applied to8 C' O/ S X/ ?" q
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the- B1 F0 ~6 ^2 e) r- I
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 5413 K( N) E$ G7 d' L; W$ z: Y
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
8 S0 [' w/ p0 }% m3 s6 K9 aing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
. J8 `% x& i$ na year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed% h8 ]& m' d; X
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-1 c u( ~ d+ C$ I
scribed by his family physician for decreased libido
0 A" I/ g! ]$ u! f( r; \secondary to depression.' w) \0 W9 i6 S; B, K1 A* I
The child slept in the same bed with parents.- c; N1 J, @: O- n
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
/ v# b7 K K6 L# d* |' Jchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-5 h1 l: Z% j$ e7 E( B/ h
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
0 \! f0 q5 u) ~' nThe father also admitted that after the phone call,. S6 `* V$ j3 F! |4 G1 n1 q
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby( X7 L& \2 T: @5 W W; F
was high, he then read the product information* t r* C" y2 J
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-6 ^$ K5 c0 [$ s# h
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
+ x% @) a+ c& u3 N+ S9 y Idecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
1 x0 u- r) [ E0 e' W4 mfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had
2 r8 U$ k& p2 k5 mbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
0 `" h* L% S* {/ g, [: v/ J. |1 Ftest was ordered, but the family did not go to the- @ W! t* ]1 u0 D& ~
laboratory to obtain the test.
% ]! O4 d: W" r: V! v, vDiscussion
- G: o: \9 d" @/ @1 uPrecocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary4 @ |( K3 ]9 B% Q9 z" K
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
1 z) S$ }2 N7 Y9 S( IPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
& R( ]. j. G" Bit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-7 C6 i7 D0 P7 K) N# k
thalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-4 f9 ]( b+ v# {( b
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP* D, r/ g: ~ h. I# `! g, X( d" N' j H
may have a central nervous system lesion that is* x6 g8 x$ {2 G0 c, s, z& V1 r
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
4 p+ y) A" x; U5 Y& w' Eamic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
- Y% U/ q t1 l- ~: }1 y. R& c$ dsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
0 g% g" G( W8 Wboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
1 `, X3 g" U! E j- V% |ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
) r* Z! S6 Z5 |$ I$ W* t/ ]: z5 o* ^rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by4 n% w$ w; L4 E8 W
gonadotropins.1,3- Z) J. _3 T, q7 z# c/ X# V, p
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-. A- |% D7 ~* g; s, p% C
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate% J$ V6 x* P" R6 k* B: B
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or; w( c" z# d& b. @5 e5 t
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
4 A0 r, e+ M F4 Q7 i* T5 h' C9 Lulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing
6 h7 Q; Z$ K* M9 d) b* w8 C- `congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive: O5 X( v: d0 d9 `. M/ `/ r
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
. R3 d6 m( ?, x5 S- zpuberty in boys.3,4
: E$ r7 t4 t) |& jThe most common form of congenital adrenal
( t2 N G& n& u' }' ~( z% S' q! Xhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.( L( Q2 x9 X, e2 U: B( \1 V/ [
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
# g' \7 b0 F+ W6 G0 i1 h! S6 g- _( m" }excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
% P. h- M. h; Q0 w2 van adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
% S: k4 q! j3 k: F$ V+ S9 g9 k" Iexcess.1,3: P' s0 z' H! i& c0 @0 ~
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
7 v5 _9 T5 l0 x4 s" S# [% Q w542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
0 c5 E0 }) r3 n& }* vA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
0 i$ t+ S( ]2 B0 windependent precocious puberty, which is also known- |: h5 ~, M5 e* Y+ f& A
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a- c" L, n1 k- |$ S3 T8 ~( r
very young age. The physical findings in these boys2 x& J- o$ X- b- b7 {
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
5 T( |) K1 [5 A) V- lincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys- V) p; o" q' K1 J+ o/ p" a0 U
with CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder3 s5 A2 ^& q" E
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show+ D6 {1 ?" u& Q. J) w9 G- M5 U) Z* A7 S3 Y
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
4 z- `( |7 C4 ], X. c3 Y) }releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
& I) h$ X/ Y8 [7 Iautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
* M3 m$ ?' y7 A {0 _& }8 p! q7 E& B) Cmales; therefore, other male members of the family
$ D' K1 j! u7 i" @( ymay have similar precocious puberty.35 W/ d, z) V3 h" S9 g& L+ j
In our patient, physical examination was incon-5 l+ T$ \$ T1 P' P; }
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-9 N- p* l6 I2 t" r
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
2 R/ c8 x+ v$ d# c1 W6 A* y* Iwas in the differential diagnosis because his father
$ H/ O- I1 G. ^& N R8 f! ^started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,
, g7 f: V9 s, p4 M* [1 x& |& Ttesticular enlargement is not that evident in the
& l. w; X1 O& qbeginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-
. p8 F% z" z- i$ Pative initial history of androgen exposure, our
* S8 o8 p' {) X- r' Sbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,9 k! Z# c9 t; ~9 @9 M
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase* E5 [7 w: |2 Y
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-4 } E6 X' R- K! q! w5 D g
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.& i; h; t) H) n2 E: a, O
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
( O, F, b% Q4 P0 Q& E( Ysuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because7 [7 a; m! H+ g
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
0 D* Y$ p1 Z( g: ] Xpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and& ^7 v( S4 t% c1 r3 n
decreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
# ?5 e; w( v% V+ u7 @( \' Yterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was0 | l& O. Z/ P2 W; i3 E& j
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’
( m2 p: w8 p2 D3 f. WDesk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
" w# ]- D5 E6 @2 ]. G6 ?. F" Gcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
! k0 o" Z; X% u2 M" {unprotected females through direct skin exposure.* ~2 ], |8 }7 u7 L. g0 t
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the8 K, k7 F( l/ x. P9 P# g
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
6 M% _ R- |2 `& V, m7 Neven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male2 t, v& l" ]. Y) ?* s* F1 k- z j
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-: w. K# k0 l6 A3 Z1 v4 w, M
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
. S3 }% ]- v$ x6 w, G! a- A1 h" }: i) zOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,7 j3 O# G" R; |# U) a
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
9 u( i% T q9 O* s0 Sdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-
3 o$ _" q( p8 |) gterone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more3 e7 F6 H8 y& v: u" G9 a
active in young children exposed to testosterone
. V& m- _4 V; C& dexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
7 L* H# z3 j0 d, x% Tdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
4 K L4 S2 o d# g. t$ L4 Q. Hvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
^0 B+ m9 f' q8 `children results in an increase in growth velocity and
( C2 o* V& ?4 wadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.$ c$ ] \* J+ k0 h
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during' g0 x$ L" `5 _1 ?6 M9 h
early childhood on pubertal development and final- O( ]: ?, b' @7 W6 N
adult height are not fully known and always remain& T# z6 M" A9 {
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-. S5 y& u! |: w# h( v% e
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
/ C: M' X1 U5 j* Facceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
* H) n( E0 `# e0 u P2 u3 T2 @ wcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
) U3 j9 i- {7 @: k6 edecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9# n6 T" Y( |2 A! o8 D4 T4 m& e, ^6 e
There are conflicting reports and controversy
9 F- r) U a; Oover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult: y& b$ b- T% f- w5 q* a: H& c
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal% ]' O' Z3 D% c/ \
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-) L) a# T9 @5 k/ q3 {0 e' h: \2 t
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,; x# n5 \/ J9 b
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
: s$ `2 V) J: G$ ?' g; \childhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult* X4 D3 H, @% @8 ~, H ^
penile length in clinical studies.2 N# N* [9 }2 y4 [# X5 V, h B
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
" s, L8 h4 J6 o" _8 P$ H$ Ogoing to experience any of the untoward effects from- z- ?" \5 m, \! H0 X
testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because% x' R. o! }3 Z* Y0 K* U" n+ s
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.# L: \% h; h) Y8 {) e
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
a4 m8 U6 [3 k, W4 D- W# Idiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at3 a/ C) r" q2 ^, C4 W" u* U! A9 ^. e
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult8 {3 K4 ^) s6 x( I
height will not be affected.
7 Q8 J2 n' e- b+ e# g) r" T% a1 W2 QAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-
9 v1 O8 n/ H" @/ @) i# Z' `ability of androgen products in our society may: J+ H' Y$ Q& K+ l c
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
+ k( R6 | B( i6 z. W7 |- Kchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
: k( L4 R1 {" S. Egen products must be considered and specific ques-- ?* ^( y B0 I+ z+ j3 j6 K
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
3 S4 F$ w1 y/ R+ d+ U* m; Ygel should be asked of the family members during
' y: k+ u& A7 hthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-- h) y9 k- ?9 r2 R/ H( m
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-/ x, R3 j' p) d( \6 Y
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by& _1 H% X0 B- J
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a8 ^3 R# g3 g1 `2 ^' C, s
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may
3 _" @) W2 {& P2 j% |. R$ D4 ?result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
! s0 j' _. \6 a0 r6 Ginvestigation. The primary care physician should be; G! w3 T7 @+ r0 D
aware of this fact, because most of these children
5 y5 M& x( L/ V+ D, Bmay initially present in their practice. The Physicians’( [6 d" g: ]+ P3 b3 A4 W
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a# T; z) C$ F* c
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or& u2 K* l; c/ Q! b6 Q
female child who might come in contact with some-1 y! ^7 ^& K9 \) s; D
one using any of these products.
4 c8 f0 o' Z5 y9 D- D+ B: LReferences
. G$ G8 K0 G; `) I/ |/ j1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation/ {; D4 Z+ _& ? a" o
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
, i$ S7 O- C/ J, @$ I- L4 A. aEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
/ L$ Q' @' U1 x' R8 L' M; g6 S2002: 565-628.' t% c; g2 ?* k+ j; T- b
2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
) X, Q4 c- W. E* ppuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|